Non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients on peritoneal dialysis, prevalence, treatment and professionals involved.

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent chronic arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and now direct oral anticoagulants have been and are the fundamental pillars for the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, there are no randomized clinical trials on the risk-benefit profile of oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on peritoneal dialysis and there is little evidence in the literature in this population. The objective of our study was to know the prevalence, treatment and professionals involved in the management of atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients. For this purpose, we performed a descriptive analysis through a survey sent to different peritoneal dialysis units in Spain. A total of 1,403 patients on peritoneal dialysis were included in the study, of whom 186 (13.2%) had non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, the assessment of the scores of thromboembolic and bleeding risks for the indication of oral anticoagulation was mainly carried out by the cardiologist (60% of the units), as well as its prescription (cardiologist 47% or in consensus with the nephrologist 43%). In summary, patients on peritoneal dialysis have a remarkable prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients frequently receive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. The data obtained regarding the scores used for the assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding risk, treatment and involvement by Nephrology indicates that there is a need for training and involvement of the nephrologist in this pathology.

Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome complicating infective endocarditis - case report.

A 37-year-old lady with infective endocarditis of the mitral valve presented in congestive cardiac failure. However, the clinical scenario became complicated when she was also found to have antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Meticulous optimization and timely surgical intervention by a multidisciplinary team helped mitigate this not so common situation and lead to successful outcome.

Thromboembolic risk and oral anticoagulation in subclinical atrial fibrillation.

Availability of devices capable of continuous rhythm monitoring such as smartwatches, implantable loop recorders, or pacemakers/defibrillators is continuously increasing. Importantly, device detected "subclinical" atrial fibrillation seems to convey a significantly lower risk of thromboembolism than "clinical" atrial fibrillation verified by a conventional ECG recording. While current guidelines indicate a possible role of oral anticoagulation in selected high-risk patients with subclinical AF, recent trials show an ambiguous risk/benefit relationship of anticoagulation in this setting. The present review therefore summarizes current data on the role of oral anticoagulation in subclinical AF, aims at aiding in the decision process of anticoagulation, and illustrates current gaps in evidence regarding subclinical AF.

Prognostic impact of oral anticoagulation therapy and atrial fibrillation in patients with type B acute aortic dissection.

Background: The prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy in patients with type B acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic impact of AF and OAC therapy in patients with type B AAD. Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with AAD were included in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients with type B AAD were selected from the study population and divided into three groups: AF(+)/OAC(+), AF(+)/OAC(-), and AF(-)/OAC(-). The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), including all-cause death, progressive aortic events, cerebral infarction, and organ malperfusion. Results: In total, 139 patients diagnosed with type B AAD were analyzed. AF was observed in 27 patients (19%). Among them, 13 patients (9%) received OAC therapy for AF. MACCE occurred in 32 patients (23%) during the observation period: all-cause death in four patients, progressive aortic events in 24 patients, cerebral infarction events in two patients, and malperfusion events in two patients. The incidence of MACCE was higher in the AF(+)/OAC(+) group than in the AF(+)/OAC(-) group (hazard ratio[HR]: 3.875; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.153-17.496). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of MACCE between the AF(+)/OAC(-) and AF(-)/OAC(-) groups (HR: 1.001, 95% CI: 0.509-1.802). Conclusion: Among patients with type B AAD, the use of OAC for AF was associated with a higher risk of MACCE.

Fibrilación auricular no valvular en pacientes en diálisis peritoneal: prevalencia, tratamiento y profesionales implicados / Non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients on peritoneal dialysis: prevalence, treatment and professionals involved

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia crónica más frecuente en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC). La anticoagulación oral con antagonistas de la vitamina K (AVK) y actualmente los anticoagulantes orales de acción directa (ACOD) han sido el pilar fundamental para la prevención de eventos tromboembólicos. Sin embargo, no existen ensayos clínicos aleatorizados de su perfil riesgo-beneficio en pacientes con ERC estadio 5 en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y son pocas las evidencias en la literatura sobre esta población. El objetivo del estudio fue conocer la prevalencia, tratamiento y profesionales implicados en el manejo de la FA en DP en nuestro entorno mediante el análisis descriptivo de una encuesta enviada a diferentes unidades de DP de España. Se incluyeron en el estudio 1.403 pacientes en programa de DP, de los cuales 186 (13,2%) presentaban FA no valvular (FANV). Además, observamos que la valoración de los scores para el inicio del tratamiento anticoagulante la realizaba mayoritariamente el cardiólogo (60% de los centros), así como la prescripción de anticoagulación (cardiólogo 47% o en conjunto con el nefrólogo 43%). En conclusión, los pacientes en DP presentan una notable prevalencia de FANV. Reciben frecuentemente anticoagulación oral (ACO) con AVK, así como con ACOD. Los datos obtenidos respecto a las escalas utilizadas para la valoración de riesgo tromboembólico y de sangrado, tratamiento e implicación por parte de Nefrología indican que existe una necesidad de formación e involucramiento del nefrólogo en esta patología.(AU)

Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent chronic arrhythmia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists and now direct oral anticoagulants have been and are the fundamental pillar for the prevention of thromboembolic events. However, there are no randomized clinical trials on the risk-benefit profile of oral anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 on peritoneal dialysis and there is little evidence in the literature in this population. The objective of our study was to know the prevalence, treatment and professionals involved in the management of atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients. For this purpose, we performed a descriptive analysis through a survey sent to different peritoneal dialysis units in Spain. A total of 1403 patients on peritoneal dialysis were included in the study, of whom 186 (13.2%) had non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, the assessment of the scores of thromboembolic and bleeding risks for the indication of oral anticoagulation was mainly carried out by the cardiologist (60% of the units), as well as its prescription (cardiologist 47% in consensus with the nephrologist 43%). In summary, patients on peritoneal dialysis have a remarkable prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients frequently receive oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists, as well as direct oral anticoagulants. The data obtained regarding the scales used for the assessment of thromboembolic and bleeding risk, treatment and involvement by Nephrology indicates that there is a need for training and involvement of the nephrologist in this pathology.(AU)

Prescribing Patterns and Outcomes of Edoxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients From Asia　- One-Year Data From the Global ETNA-AF Program.

Background: This study reports prescribing patterns and the 1-year effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in an Asian cohort of Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice (ETNA)-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients. Methods and Results: The Global ETNA-AF program integrates prospective, observational, noninterventional regional studies, collecting data on characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with AF receiving edoxaban for stroke prevention. Baseline characteristics, medical history, and 1-year clinical event rates were assessed in patients from South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Clinically relevant events assessed at 12 months included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolic events (SEEs), bleeding, and net clinical outcome (NCO). Overall, 3,359 patients treated with edoxaban 60 or 30 mg once daily completed 1-year follow-up; 70.9% of patients received recommended dosing according to local labels. Baseline mean±standard deviation age was 71.7±9.6 years, CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.1±1.5, and modified HAS-BLED score was 2.3±1.1. Mean age and sex were similar across countries/regions. The 1-year event rate for all-cause death was 1.8%; major bleeding, 1.3%; ischemic stroke, 1.1%; cardiovascular mortality, 0.7%; hemorrhagic stroke, 0.3%; SEEs, 0%; and NCO, 4.1%; with differences observed between countries/regions and dosing groups. Conclusions: Most Asian patients with AF were prescribed recommended edoxaban dosing in routine care settings. At 1-year follow-up, this analysis supports the effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in these patients.

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

An effective anticoagulation therapy is required for patients with atrial fibrillation because it presents a significant risk of stroke. The current study evaluates the relative safety as well as efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients who are diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. A thorough literature review of relevant databases was conducted, focusing on academic and clinical studies that were published from 2017 onward. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials and other observational studies comparing the incidence of stroke and the safety index of rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for data overview reporting and overview. A total of 21 studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. A total of 19/21 studies advocated the adoption of rivaroxaban for minimizing stroke incidence. Rivaroxaban also showed superiority in achieving the therapeutic objectives, i.e., reduction in the incidence of stroke. The results for rivaroxaban against warfarin showed an improved safety index and effectiveness of rivaroxaban. The total effect size for the analysis was calculated to be Z=2.62 (p-value=0.009). The individual effect of all studies favored the "rivaroxaban" group. The heterogeneity in the study was as follows: tau2=0.10; chi2=110.10, df=6; I2=95%. The second analysis for risk reduction and incidence of stroke after rivaroxaban therapy also showed a bias towards rivaroxaban therapy. The combined effect for the analysis was found to be as follows: HR=0.73 ((95% CI: 0.50, 1.07). The total effect was calculated to be Z=1.61 (p-value= 0.10). The heterogeneity was found to be as follows: tau2= 0.20, chi2=89.97, df=6, I2=93%. Standard dosing of rivaroxaban emerges as a preferred strategy for stroke prevention, balancing efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making should consider individual patient characteristics and future research should delve into specific subpopulations and long-term outcomes to further refine treatment guidelines.

Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism after catheter-directed thrombolysis with dabigatran vs warfarin: results of a multicenter randomized RE-SPIRE trial.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy is effective method in the high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment. Reduced-dose thrombolysis (RDT) plus oral anticoagulation therapy is effective and safe method in the moderate and severe PE treatment. It is leading to good early and intermediate-term outcomes. In the RE-COVER and RE-COVER II studies, dabigatran showed similar effectiveness as warfarin in the treatment of acute PE. Dabigatran leads to fewer hemorrhagic complications and is not inferior in efficacy to warfarin in the prevention of PE after mechanical fragmentation and RDT (catheter-directed treatment [CDT]+RDT) in patients with high and intermediate to high PE risk. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety (incidence of clinically significant recurrence of venous thromboembolic complications and deaths) during a 6-month course of treatment with dabigatran or warfarin in patients with high and intermediate to high acute PE risk after endovascular mechanical thrombus fragmentation procedure with RDT (CDT+RDT). METHODS: The RE-SPIRE is a prospective, multicenter randomized double-arm study. Over a 5-year period, 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic high and intermediate to high PE risk after endovascular mechanical thrombus fragmentation procedure with RDT (CDT+RDT) were randomized into two groups within the next 48 hours. The first group continued treatment with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day for 6 months; the second group continued treatment with warfarin under the control of international normalized ratio (2.0-3.0) for 6 months. Both groups received low molecular weight heparins for 2 days after surgery. Then, group 1 continued to receive low molecular-weight-heparin for 5 to 7 days, followed by a switch to dabigatran at a dosage of 150 mg two times a day. Group 2 received both low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin up to an international normalized ratio of >2.0, followed by heparin withdrawal. The follow-up period was 6 months. RESULTS: There were 63 patients who completed the study (32 in the dabigatran group and 31 in the warfarin group). In both groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean pulmonary artery pressure. The mean pulmonary artery pressure at the 6-month follow-up after surgery was 24 mm Hg (interquartile range, 20.3-29.25 mm Hg) in the dabigatran group and 23 mm Hg (interquartile range, 20.0-26.3 mm Hg) in the warfarin group. The groups did not differ statistically in the deep vein thrombosis dynamics. Partial recanalization occurred in 52.0% vs 73.1% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively (P = .15). Complete recanalization occurred in 28.0% vs 19.2% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively (P = .56). The groups did not differ in the frequency of major bleeding events according to the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (0% vs 3.2% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively; P = 1.00). However, there were more nonmajor bleeding events in the warfarin group than in the dabigatran group (16.1% vs 0%, respectively; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study show that dabigatran is comparable in effectiveness to warfarin. Dabigatran has greater safety in comparison with warfarin in the occurrence of all cases of bleeding in the postoperative and long-term periods. Thus, dabigatran may be recommended for the treatment and prevention of PE after CDT with RDT in patients with high and intermediate to high PE risk.

Uninterrupted direct-acting oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures: The DOAC-NOSTOP study rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) under treatment with chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) often require coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Deciding the management of OAC during this periprocedural period requires balancing the risks of hemorrhage and thrombotic complications. Guidelines recommend an uninterrupted strategy in patients receiving Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKA). However, for patients undergoing coronary angiography or PCI while on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), withdrawal 12-24 h prior to the procedure is still recommended. This is based on expert opinions given the lack of evidence. Therefore, whether DOAC discontinuation prior to trans-radial coronary procedures should be the strategy of choice is a matter of debate and solid evidence is needed to guide clinical decision making. METHODS: The DOAC-NOSTOP study is a prospective, single-arm, open-label study evaluating the safety of DOACs continuation in 200 patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary procedures. DOAC treatment will not be interrupted throughout the periprocedural period. Primary outcome will be Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 events, assessed at a 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The DOAC-NOSTOP is the first study prospectively assessing the risk of bleeding with uninterrupted DOAC in patients undergoing trans-radial percutaneous coronary procedures.

Incidence and patterns of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter-the FLUTFIB study.

AIMS: In patients with atrial flutter (AFL), ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is a highly effective procedure to prevent AFL recurrence, but atrial fibrillation (AF) may occur during follow-up. The presented FLUTFIB study was designed to identify the exact incidence, duration, timely occurrence, and associated symptoms of AF after CTI ablation using continuous cardiac monitoring via implantable loop recorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AFL without prior AF diagnosis were included after CTI ablation (mean age 69.7 ± 9.7 years, 18% female) and received an implantable loop recorder for AF detection. After a median follow-up of 24 months 77 patients (77%) were diagnosed with AF episodes. Median time to first AF occurrence was 180 (43-298) days. Episodes lasted longer than 1 h in most patients (45/77, 58%). Forty patients (52%) had AF-associated symptoms.Patients with and without AF development showed similar baseline characteristics and neither HATCH- nor CHA2DS2-VASc scores were predictive of future AF episodes. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) was stopped during FU in 32 patients (32%) and was re-initiated after AF detection in 15 patients (15%). No strokes or transient ischaemic attack episodes were observed during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest investigation using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) to detect AF after AFL ablation and shows a high incidence of AF episodes, most of them being asymptomatic and lasting longer than 1 h. In anticipation of trials determining the duration of AF episodes that should trigger OAC initiation, these results will help to guide anticoagulation management after CTI ablation.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Reduced Doses of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: This Nordic observational cohort study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared to standard warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The study, utilizing nationwide administrative databases from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, spanned from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 (2017 for Sweden). The cohort included 26,883 patients initiating reduced-dose DOACs and 108,014 comparable warfarin patients. Effectiveness was measured by the composite endpoint of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, while safety was assessed through intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: The meta-analysis across countries revealed similar or lower incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients on reduced-dose DOACs compared to standard warfarin (rivaroxaban: HR 0.93, dabigatran: HR 0.88, apixaban: HR 0.79). Incidences within warfarin groups ranged from 2.16 to 3.71 per 100 person-years, comparable to DOAC recipients. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were generally low, ranging from 0.16 to 1.85 per 100 person-years. In comparison with warfarin patients, meta-analyses yielded HRs for rivaroxaban (1.41), dabigatran (0.35), and apixaban (0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, atrial fibrillation patients initiating reduced-dose rivaroxaban and dabigatran exhibited incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism similar to warfarin, and for apixaban, even lower. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable to or lower for patients on DOACs compared to warfarin.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Agents After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing long-term outcomes between non-vitamin K antagonist (VKA) oral anticoagulant agents (direct oral anticoagulant agents [DOACs]) and VKA anticoagulant agents after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are scarce, with conflicting results. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the periprocedural, short-term, and long-term safety and effectiveness of DOACs vs VKAs in patients undergoing TAVR via femoral access with concomitant indications for oral anticoagulation. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in the prospective national SwissTAVI Registry between February 2011 and June 2021 were analyzed. Net clinical benefit (a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and life-threatening or major bleeding) and the primary safety endpoint (a composite of life-threatening and major bleeding) were compared between the VKA and DOAC groups at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years after TAVR. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1,454 patients were available for analysis in each group. There was no significant difference in the rate of the net clinical benefit and the safety endpoints between the groups as assessed at 30 days and 1 and 5 years post-TAVR between VKAs and DOACs. VKAs were associated with significantly higher rates of 1- year (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.62) and 5-year (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.11-1.40) all-cause mortality. Long-term risk for disabling stroke was significantly lower in the VKA group after excluding periprocedural events (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: At 5 years after TAVR, VKAs are associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality, a lower risk for disabling stroke, and a similar rate of life-threatening or major bleeding compared with DOACs. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

A decade of experience in over 300 surgically treated spine patients with long-term oral anticoagulation: a propensity score matched cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the risks and outcomes of patients with long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: All patients on long-term OAC who underwent spine surgery between 01/2005 and 06/2015 were included. Data were prospectively collected within our in-house Spine Surgery registry and retrospectively supplemented with patient chart and administrative database information. A 1:1 propensity score-matched group of patients without OAC from the same time interval served as control. Primary outcomes were post-operative bleeding, wound complications and thromboembolic events up to 90 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, death and 3-month post-operative patient-rated outcomes. RESULTS: In comparison with the control group, patients with OAC (n = 332) had a 3.4-fold (95%CI 1.3-9.0) higher risk for post-operative bleeding, whereas the risks for wound complications and thromboembolic events were comparable between groups. The higher bleeding risk was driven by a higher rate of extraspinal haematomas (3.3% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.001), while there was no difference in epidural haematomas and haematoma evacuations. Risk factors for adverse events among patients with OAC were mechanical heart valves, posterior neck surgery, blood loss > 1000 mL, age, female sex, BMI > 30 kg/m2 and post-operative PTT levels. At 3-month follow-up, most patients reported favourable outcomes with no difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Although OAC patients have a higher risk for complications after spine surgery, the risk for major events is low and patients benefit similarly from surgery.

Is a minimum duration of 5 days of unfractionated heparin infusion necessary before transition to oral anticoagulation in cerebral venous thrombosis? a retrospective chart review.

In managing cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT), the standard approach has been administering parenteral anticoagulation for at least five days, despite limited supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine the optimal duration of parenteral anticoagulation for CVT patients and its potential impact on their functional outcomes upon discharge. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted across multiple healthcare centers and included adult CVT patients who received varying durations of parenteral anticoagulation: less than 5 days (n = 25) or 5 days or more (n = 16). The primary focus was on the duration of acute anticoagulation treatment, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay length and functional outcomes. The study found that a shorter duration of anticoagulation treatment (< 5 days) was linked to more favorable outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (68% vs. 25%, RR = 0.37, CI 0.15-0.90, p = 0.007). However, regression analysis showed non statistically significant associations for all variables except gender. Female patients were significantly more likely to receive a shorter duration of anticoagulation (Odds Ratio: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.1, P-Value: <0.001). These findings suggest a potential connection between shorter anticoagulation duration (< 5 days) and improved CVT patient outcomes, as indicated by their mRS scores at discharge. The observed relationship between female gender and shorter anticoagulation duration warrants further exploration. Nevertheless, caution is necessary when interpreting these findings due to the small sample size and specific patient characteristics. Further research in a larger and more diverse cohort is essential to validate these results and understand their implications fully.

Association between antithrombotic therapy after stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and the risk of net clinical outcome: an observational cohort study.

AIMS: Data on the optimal use of antithrombotic drugs and associated clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute ischaemic stroke (IS) are limited. We investigated the prescription patterns of antithrombotics in community practice and long-term clinical prognosis according to early post-stroke antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF and acute IS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with AF who were admitted for acute IS at a single tertiary hospital in 2010-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical profiles including the aetiology of stroke and prescription patterns of antithrombotics were identified. The net clinical outcome (NCO)-the composite of recurrent stroke, any bleeding, hospitalization or emergency department visits for cardiovascular (CV) events, and death-was compared according to the antithrombotic therapy at the first outpatient clinic visit [oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone vs. antiplatelet (APT) alone vs. OAC/APT(s)] following discharge. A total of 918 patients with AF and acute IS (mean age, 72.6 years; male, 59.3%; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.3) were analysed. One-third (33.9%, n = 310) of patients were simultaneously diagnosed with AF and IS. The most common aetiology of IS was cardioembolism (71.2%), followed by undetermined aetiology (19.8%) and large artery atherosclerosis (6.0%). OAC, APT(s), and concomitant OAC and APT(s) were prescribed in 33.4%, 11.1%, and 53.4% of patients during admission that changed to 67.0%, 9.1%, and 21.7% at the first outpatient clinic, and were mostly continued up to one year after IS. Non-prescription of OAC was observed in 11.3% of post-stroke patients with AF. During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the overall incidence rate of NCO per 100 patient-year (PY) was 20.14. APT(s) monotherapy presented the highest cumulative risk of NCO (adjusted hazard ratio 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.00, P = 0.015; with reference to OAC monotherapy) mainly driven by the highest rates of recurrent stroke and any bleeding. OAC/APT(s) combination therapy was associated with a 1.62-fold significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke (P = 0.040) and marginally higher risk of any bleeding than OAC monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of acute IS in AF have a distinctive mechanism from cardioembolism. Although APT was frequently prescribed in post-stroke patients with AF, no additive clinical benefit was observed. Adherence to OAC treatment is essential to prevent further CV adverse events in patients with AF and IS.

Short-term antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy after left atrial appendage closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of different antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their inception to March 2023. Patients were divided into short-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) group and antiplatelet therapy (APT) group. The incidence of events were performed using RevMan 5.4. The events including device-related thrombus (DRT), ischemic stroke/systemic embolization (SE), major bleeding, any bleeding, any major adverse event and all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis were based on OAC alone or OAC plus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in OAC group. Oral anticoagulants include warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Fourteen studies with 35,166 patients were included. We found that the incidence of DRT (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.36-0.66, P＜0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in OAC group than APT group. However, there was no statistical differences in the incidence rates of ischemic stroke/SE (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.20, P = 0.25), major bleeding (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.55-1.27, P = 0.84), any bleeding (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.22, P = 0.34) and any major adverse event (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.30-1.03, P = 0.06) in the two groups. Subgroup analysis found that the incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality and any major adverse event in OAC monotherapy were lower than that in APT group (P＜0.05), but not statistically different from other outcome. The incidence of DRT, all-cause mortality, any major adverse event and any bleeding in DOAC were significantly better than APT group (P＜0.05). While warfarin only has better incidence of DRT than APT (P＜0.05), there was no statistical difference between the two groups in other outcome (P＞0.05). The incidence of DRT was significantly lower than APT group (P＜0.05), major bleeding were higher, and the rest of the outcome did not show any statistically significant differences(P＞0.05) when OAC plus SAPT. Based on the existing data, short-term OAC may be favored over APT for patients who undergo LAAC. DOAC monotherapy may be favored over warfarin monotherapy or OAC plus APT, when selecting anticoagulant therapies.